top of page
Image by Daniele Franchi

Economic Resilience and Reality: Why Sri Lanka Is the Second Most Expensive SAARC Country to Live In

  • Umasha De Mel
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • 9 min read

Introduction


The years following the COVID-19 pandemic have fundamentally reshaped Sri Lanka’s economic, social, and political environment. Once praised for its relative affordability and moderate cost of living compared to its South Asian neighbors, Sri Lanka now finds itself ranked as the second most expensive country to live in within the SAARC region, surpassed only by the Maldives.


This transformation did not occur overnight; it is the result of multiple intersecting domestic and global factors that exposed long-standing structural weaknesses, fiscal mismanagement, and heavy reliance on imports. These vulnerabilities, when combined with external shocks such as global fuel price fluctuations, currency depreciation, and supply chain disruptions, created a complex cost-of-living crisis that continues to shape the everyday lives of Sri Lankans.


According to Numbeo, a global cost-of-living database, the average monthly cost of living for an individual in Sri Lanka is around USD 506 (approximately Rs. 153,899) excluding rent, while a family of four in Colombo requires close to Rs. 570,997 per month to maintain a comfortable lifestyle. These figures include essential expenditures on groceries, utilities, education, transportation, and healthcare.


Such data illustrate how post-crisis recovery has been uneven. While national-level macroeconomic stability indicators such as inflation, reserves, and GDP growth have shown improvement, the lived experience of ordinary households remains defined by persistent inflationary pressure, stagnant wages, and declining purchasing power. This tension between macroeconomic resilience and microeconomic hardship defines the core of Sri Lanka’s current economic reality.


How Sri Lanka Became the Most Expensive SAARC Country

Sri Lanka’s elevated cost of living is the outcome of deeply rooted economic and structural issues. The pandemic did not create these weaknesses but accelerated and exposed them. The combination of import dependency, currency depreciation, fiscal tightening, and global inflation produced a situation where even essential commodities became unaffordable for a significant portion of the population.


Courtesy: ABC News
Courtesy: ABC News

Several additional factors contribute to Sri Lanka’s high living costs. Rapid urbanization and growing demand for quality goods in cities like Colombo have pushed prices higher, particularly for housing, food, and services. Heavy import duties and taxation on essential and luxury goods further increase household expenditure. Frequent policy shifts and regulatory uncertainty create market inefficiencies, resulting in price volatility. Structural income inequality means that many low and middle-income families struggle to afford basic necessities, while urban elites and foreign-linked consumption maintain elevated price levels. Collectively, these dynamics explain why Sri Lanka has become the second most expensive SAARC country to live in.


Import Dependency and Currency Depreciation

Sri Lanka’s economy has long been import-oriented, relying on external sources for petroleum, food, pharmaceuticals, vehicles, and manufacturing inputs. Consequently, fluctuations in the exchange rate have a direct and immediate impact on domestic prices.


Between 2020 and 2025, the Sri Lankan Rupee depreciated from about Rs. 200 per USD to around Rs. 305–310 per USD. This represents a near-50 percent decline in value, translating into sharp increases in the prices of imported goods. Fuel, machinery, raw materials, and consumer goods all became substantially more expensive, feeding inflation across all sectors of the economy.


Currency depreciation affects consumers in two ways. First, it raises the direct cost of imported items such as fuel, milk powder, sugar, and cooking gas. Second, it drives up the indirect cost of goods and services, as producers and retailers pass on higher import and transport costs to consumers.


Although nominal wages have increased in both the public and private sectors, these increments have not kept pace with inflation. As a result, real purchasing power has declined. In an economy where more than half of household expenditure depends on imported or import-linked goods, depreciation functions as an invisible tax on consumers. The rupee’s weakness remains one of the central reasons why Sri Lanka has become such an expensive place to live.


Rising Food Costs and Inflationary Pressures

Food inflation remains one of the most visible components of Sri Lanka’s cost-of-living crisis. According to data from the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL), between September 2024 and September 2025, the average price of nine commonly consumed vegetables rose from Rs. 225 per kg to Rs. 321.10 per kg — a 42.7 percent increase within a single year.


Several interrelated factors explain this escalation. Fuel price hikes pushed up transportation and logistics costs, while fertilizer shortages and adverse weather reduced agricultural yields. Import restrictions further limited access to cheaper foreign goods, and the depreciating exchange rate increased the cost of imported agricultural inputs and packaging.


Because food accounts for more than one-third of the typical household budget, any increase in food prices directly affects disposable income. Families across the island have been forced to adjust their consumption habits, replacing imported products with lower-quality local substitutes or reducing meal frequency. The nutritional and social implications of this trend are significant, especially for low-income and rural families.


Government efforts such as fertilizer subsidies, relief packages, and targeted welfare programs have provided some support, but these remain inadequate compared to the scale of need. For many Sri Lankans, food insecurity has become a daily concern rather than an abstract economic issue.


Electricity and Water Costs amidst Energy Reforms

Energy and utilities have undergone major structural reform as part of the government’s fiscal stabilization program. The Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) approved several tariff revisions in 2023 and 2024 to reflect true market costs. Electricity rates rose by approximately 18–22 percent, while water tariffs increased by about 15 percent.


Sri Lanka relies heavily on imported fuel for electricity generation, especially during dry seasons when hydropower output is low. Global oil price fluctuations and the depreciation of the rupee have made energy imports far more expensive. Although these tariff revisions were intended to reduce losses incurred by state-owned utilities, they have placed additional strain on households and small businesses.


Higher electricity and water costs also feed into the general price level by raising production expenses for goods and services. For many urban households, utilities now account for 10–15 percent of total income, while small enterprises face increased overheads that limit competitiveness and job creation.


Fuel Prices and Transportation Costs

The domestic fuel market provides a clear example of how international dynamics translate into local hardship. As of late 2025, petrol (92 Octane) is priced at around Rs. 370 per litre and diesel at Rs. 325 per litre, nearly double their pre-crisis levels in 2019.


These high prices have a multiplier effect across the economy. Public transport fares have risen, disproportionately burdening low-income commuters who depend on buses and trains. Freight and logistics costs have surged, inflating the prices of food and consumer goods. Manufacturing and construction sectors have experienced rising input costs, reducing overall productivity and profitability.


While global oil prices have stabilized since 2023, domestic fuel prices remain elevated due to import taxes, distribution inefficiencies, and the still-weak exchange rate. The government’s limited fiscal capacity to subsidize energy further entrenches these high costs. Consequently, the expense of mobility, whether for personal travel or goods transportation, remains a major contributor to overall living costs.


Vehicle Costs and Import Restrictions

The vehicle import ban imposed between 2020 and 2024 created a severe imbalance in the automobile market. With no new imports allowed, the prices of used vehicles skyrocketed by as much as 300 percent. Even after partial relaxation, high import duties and the weakened currency have kept vehicle ownership prohibitively expensive.


For the middle class, owning a car or motorbike — once a symbol of upward mobility — has become a distant goal. Rising prices of spare parts, tyres, and insurance premiums further compound this burden. In addition, the shortage of affordable vehicles has reduced workforce mobility, particularly in rural areas where public transport options are limited.


These conditions have contributed to the overall perception of an increasingly expensive living environment, as transport costs now consume a growing portion of household budgets.


Post-Covid Economic Background

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered Sri Lanka’s most severe economic crisis in modern history. The abrupt collapse of tourism — once responsible for nearly 5 billion USD in annual revenue — wiped out a major source of foreign exchange, while worker remittances also fell sharply as global economic activity slowed. Supply chain disruptions compounded these effects, leading to shortages of essential goods, higher import costs, and inflationary pressures across the economy. These shocks coincided with years of fiscal mismanagement, heavy debt accumulation, and declining foreign reserves, culminating in the 2022 foreign exchange crisis and eventual default.


Beyond macroeconomic consequences, the pandemic altered household behavior: families reduced consumption, postponed investments, and became increasingly reliant on informal credit. The crisis highlighted the vulnerabilities of an import-dependent economy and accelerated structural weaknesses in agriculture, energy, and manufacturing sectors. Additionally, disruptions in education, healthcare, and labor markets had long-term social and economic impacts, particularly for low-income and rural communities. Ultimately, the pandemic set the stage for a “new normal” where households face permanently higher costs for basic necessities, even as national-level economic indicators begin to recover.


Price Indices

Colombo Consumer Price Index (CCPI)


Courtesy: Daily Mirror
Courtesy: Daily Mirror

The CCPI is Sri Lanka’s primary measure of inflation within the urban capital region. Compiled by the Department of Census and Statistics, it tracks price changes in a fixed basket of goods and services purchased by typical Colombo households. These items include food, clothing, housing, utilities, healthcare, transport, education, and recreation.


As of September 2025, the CCPI registered a headline inflation rate of 4.8 percent — significantly lower than the double-digit levels seen during 2022. However, the apparent moderation masks underlying challenges. Core inflation, which excludes volatile categories such as food and energy, remains elevated due to persistent increases in education fees, healthcare costs, and housing rents.


Colombo’s high cost of living stems partly from its economic structure. The city hosts the bulk of private-sector employment, higher land values, and greater dependence on imported services. These factors combine to keep the CCPI consistently above national averages, reflecting the high urban cost base.


National Consumer Price Index

The NCPI provides a broader, nationwide measure of inflation, covering all provinces and a more diverse range of households. It captures both rural and urban price trends and is thus a more comprehensive indicator of overall affordability.


According to CBSL data, the NCPI has also shown a deceleration in inflation rates since 2023, but the gap between nominal price levels and real incomes persists. Rural households spend a higher proportion of their income on food and transport, which remain the most inflation-sensitive categories. Even small price increases in these areas translate into significant hardship.


Furthermore, regional disparities have widened. The Western Province, home to Colombo, continues to outpace other regions in income growth, while provinces such as Uva and Northern lag behind. As a result, inequality in cost-of-living impacts has grown sharper, demonstrating that national averages often hide the deeper rural struggles of affordability.


The Purchasing Power Challenge

Currency depreciation and persistent inflation have together eroded the real value of wages. Salary increments in both the public and private sectors have been minimal, and they fail to match the pace of price growth. Consequently, households are spending more for the same quantity of goods and services, with little improvement in income.


The erosion of purchasing power has several implications. Savings rates have declined as families prioritize immediate consumption, while personal debt, particularly credit card and informal borrowing, has increased. Retirees and fixed-income earners are among the most affected groups, as their incomes remain static while living costs climb.


The decline in real purchasing power has also contributed to a shift in social behavior. Young professionals increasingly seek foreign employment opportunities, leading to a gradual brain drain. Families, meanwhile, delay major life decisions such as home ownership or starting families due to financial uncertainty.


Although inflation statistics may suggest progress, the ground-level reality remains one of constrained budgets and reduced financial security.


Economic Resilienc Amid Rising costs

Despite the high cost-of-living environment, Sri Lanka has demonstrated remarkable economic resilience. This resilience reflects the country’s ability to prevent systemic collapse even under extreme financial and social stress. Fiscal stabilization measures, including expenditure prioritization and reduction of non-essential subsidies, allowed the government to maintain macroeconomic order while avoiding hyperinflation. Debt restructuring under the IMF’s Extended Fund Facility (EFF) alleviated external debt pressures and restored confidence in global financial markets.


Careful monetary management, including interest rate adjustments and liquidity control, helped stabilize the rupee and moderate inflation to manageable levels. International support through aid, remittances, and the gradual recovery of tourism provided the liquidity necessary to import essentials and finance energy requirements. At the sectoral level, agriculture and industrial production began a slow recovery, reducing reliance on imports and improving domestic supply chains.


These measures have strengthened public and investor confidence, attracting some foreign investment and enabling gradual economic growth. Fiscal prudence has prevented the government from resorting to uncontrolled money printing, limiting inflationary spirals. Monetary policies have created a controlled environment that allows businesses to plan ahead despite high input costs. Energy reforms have increased efficiency in public utilities, helping reduce losses in the sector. Social programs have mitigated extreme poverty for vulnerable groups, although the reach remains limited.


Nevertheless, the benefits of macroeconomic stability have not fully trickled down to households. High food, fuel, and utility costs continue to strain disposable incomes. Small businesses face rising operating costs and tighter credit conditions, slowing job creation and investment. Thus, the country exhibits macroeconomic resilience while individual financial hardship persists, creating a paradox of statistical recovery alongside everyday economic strain.


The Broader Social Impact

 The high cost of living extends beyond economics. Rising expenses have triggered increased urban migration, as rural residents seek better-paying jobs in cities or abroad. Young couples postpone marriage and childbirth due to financial insecurity, contributing to a demographic shift. Meanwhile, skilled professionals continue to emigrate, resulting in a gradual brain drain.


Social inequality has deepened, dividing those with access to foreign-currency income from those dependent on rupee earnings. The psychological toll, anxiety, stress, and declining quality of life, underscores that Sri Lanka’s cost-of-living crisis is as much human as it is economic.


Conclusion

Within the SAARC region, Sri Lanka’s experience is distinct. The Maldives remains the most expensive due to its dependence on imports and limited agricultural base, but its high tourism revenue offsets these costs through elevated income levels. India, Bangladesh, and Nepal enjoy lower cost-of-living indices thanks to stronger domestic production capacities and relatively stable currencies. Pakistan faces high inflation but benefits from lower food and housing costs than Sri Lanka.


Sri Lanka’s unique position lies in its middle-income aspirations combined with structural import dependence. The country seeks high-quality consumption standards without equivalent domestic production capacity, creating a persistent trade deficit. This imbalance amplifies vulnerability to external shocks and perpetuates inflationary pressure.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page